Skip to main content
فارسی Book an audit

All Services

Service pillar

Cloud Transformation: From guesswork to a roadmap; from a roadmap to execution

We move you to the cloud step by step and measurably, without cost or security surprises.

Book an audit See the modules

Modules in this pillar

4 engineered modules, in the order they run

  1. Cloud Assessment & Roadmap

    A full inventory of your current infrastructure and cost projection, for an accurate cloud migration decision.

    View Details

  2. Architecture Design

    Secure, scalable cloud architecture design sized to your business's actual scale.

    View Details

  3. Cloud Migration

    Executing migration in small, reversible phases, targeting zero or near-zero downtime.

    View Details

  4. Optimization

    Identifying idle or oversized resources to cut monthly cloud spend and improve performance.

    View Details

The KaraHub return-on-investment model

Infrastructure cost and payback calculator

Pick the three parameters that describe your organisation and see the estimated saving, the payback period and a recommended architecture right here.

1 Organisation size

How many people connect to your systems daily?

2 Current infrastructure

Where do your services run today?

3 Availability dependence

How many hours of downtime actually stops your work?

Estimated annual saving

126 million toman per year

Payback
11.0 months
Downtime avoided
23 hours a year
What KaraHub costs
393 million toman
Your technology spend today
947 million toman
Where does this number come from?
Internal time freed up 253 million toman
Wasted cloud spend recovered 71 million toman
Hardware purchases deferred Nothing here, in your situation
Value of the hours work does not stop 195 million toman
Total 519 million toman
Less what KaraHub costs − 393 million toman
Net saving 126 million toman

All four come from a model whose inputs are sourced: the approved 1405 minimum wage, a network engineer salary survey, the industrial electricity tariff, and published cloud waste research. The hours figure is a loss that does not happen rather than a bill that stops arriving, which is why these four do not add up to your spend today.

Recommended architecture

Public cloud with independent backup and central access control

Backup is moved off the provider itself, so one account-level failure cannot take the data and its backup together.

These figures are still under review and are shown as a preliminary estimate.

Discuss this estimate

This is an estimate, not a quote. The real figure comes out of an audit of your infrastructure, and cannot honestly be promised without seeing it.

Architecture compared

How is this different from the usual way?

Each row is one engineering decision that shows up in practice.

On The usual approach KaraHub
Dependence on the provider Proprietary services and formats that make leaving expensive Standard, open tooling, so another team can carry on without us
Network path Everything goes through one international link More than one route, so one link going down does not stop the day
Recovering from a failure A nightly backup, which means up to a day of work lost Point-in-time snapshots at short intervals, with the restore tested

These rows are not approved yet and were written from the original design.

Before you ask

What people ask about this service

See every question
How do we know our backups are actually restorable?

A backup that's never been restore-tested isn't really a backup. On every project that includes backups, we test and document the restore process itself, not just confirm the scheduled job ran successfully.